Back to workflows
FinanceReconcile and flagSmall business

Small-business daily cash brief

Reconcile yesterday’s sales, payouts, refunds, and bills into one short owner brief.

What this workflow does

Reconcile yesterday’s sales, payouts, refunds, and bills into one short owner brief. It uses deterministic matching where possible, isolates unresolved differences, and leaves every material classification to an accountable reviewer.

What you gain

The owner sees cash surprises before starting the day.

What the AI agent changes

How this worked before

Exact matching worked for identical records; ambiguous names, missing fields, and inconsistent documents still created a manual queue.

What the AI agent changes

The agent combines deterministic checks with document understanding, explains uncertain matches, and sends only real exceptions for review.

Agent trigger

The daily finance review runs after payment feeds settle.

Inputs

  • Process context: sales, payment payouts, refunds, bank activity, bills, and prior baseline
  • Approved policies, ownership, and exception rules

Agent flow

  1. 1

    Normalize records and validate period, currency, and ownership.

  2. 2

    Apply deterministic matching rules before model-assisted classification.

  3. 3

    Prepare a result covering matched cash movement, material differences, and today’s action list and isolate every unresolved difference.

  4. 4

    Post only approved matches and retain the reconciliation evidence.

Human decisions

After step 3

The accountable process owner approves matched cash movement, material differences, and today’s action list.

Outcome

  • Reviewed daily owner cash brief
  • Evidence, exceptions, and audit trail

Guardrails

  • Never auto-clear unresolved or material differences.
  • Preserve source rows and match rationale in the audit trail.

Risks and mitigations

A plausible but incorrect match can hide a material difference.

Keep deterministic rules outside the model and require review above materiality thresholds.

Sources and evidence