Investment due diligence research
Collect source-linked company, market, and risk evidence into an analyst-reviewed memo.
What this workflow does
Collect source-linked company, market, and risk evidence into an analyst-reviewed memo. It separates observed facts from inference, surfaces conflicting evidence, and delivers a review-ready finding set instead of an opaque answer.
What you gain
Analyst-reviewed diligence memo
What the AI agent changes
How this worked before
Traditional automation could collect records, but a person still had to compare sources, resolve conflicts, and write the conclusion.
What the AI agent changes
The agent can plan a search, inspect multiple sources, distinguish facts from inference, and return a cited report.
Agent trigger
An approved company or transaction enters due diligence.
Inputs
- Process context: company filings, approved research, data room, and diligence questions
- Approved policies, ownership, and exception rules
Agent flow
- 1
Collect source material from the approved systems and record its timestamp.
- 2
Cross-check conflicting signals and separate facts from inference.
- 3
Prepare a cited finding set with conflicts and unknowns with citations, unknowns, and confidence.
- 4
Deliver the approved report and preserve its evidence set.
Human decisions
After step 3
The accountable process owner approves a cited finding set with conflicts and unknowns.
Outcome
- Analyst-reviewed diligence memo
- Evidence, exceptions, and audit trail
Guardrails
- Label inference separately from observed facts.
- Do not close the investigation while required sources are unavailable.
Risks and mitigations
Missing or stale evidence can produce a confident but incomplete finding.
Show source coverage, conflicts, timestamps, and unanswered questions.
Sources and evidence
Sources establish feasibility or impact. Not every metric comes from an identical implementation.