Back to workflows
FinanceInvestigate and reportTeam

Variance reporting with evidence

Explain material plan-versus-actual variances from connected finance evidence.

What this workflow does

Explain material plan-versus-actual variances from connected finance evidence. It separates observed facts from inference, surfaces conflicting evidence, and delivers a review-ready finding set instead of an opaque answer.

What you gain

Reviewer-approved variance narrative

What the AI agent changes

How this worked before

Traditional automation could collect records, but a person still had to compare sources, resolve conflicts, and write the conclusion.

What the AI agent changes

The agent connects financial and operational evidence, weighs competing explanations, and produces a cited variance narrative for review.

Agent trigger

A reporting period closes or a material variance threshold is crossed.

Inputs

  • Process context: actuals, plan, forecast, operational drivers, and commentary
  • Approved policies, ownership, and exception rules

Agent flow

  1. 1

    Collect source material from the approved systems and record its timestamp.

  2. 2

    Cross-check conflicting signals and separate facts from inference.

  3. 3

    Prepare a cited variance explanation and open questions with citations, unknowns, and confidence.

  4. 4

    Deliver the approved report and preserve its evidence set.

Human decisions

After step 3

The accountable process owner approves a cited variance explanation and open questions.

Outcome

  • Reviewer-approved variance narrative
  • Evidence, exceptions, and audit trail

Guardrails

  • Label inference separately from observed facts.
  • Do not close the investigation while required sources are unavailable.

Risks and mitigations

Missing or stale evidence can produce a confident but incomplete finding.

Show source coverage, conflicts, timestamps, and unanswered questions.

Sources and evidence